Columnist: The ages-old Mac-vs.-PC debate is over. Long over. The Mac has won.

new imac… And yet, you’re not buying an Apple computer. Most of the world isn’t. There is probably a single overwhelming reason you’re clinging to Windows. Macs are expensive. This is what you’ve been told, and in your research, it’s seemed to check out. If they acknowledge it at all, Mac fans will rationalize the higher prices by noting that you’re paying for quality. Buying a Mac, folks say, is like buying a BMW (Apple CEO Steve Jobs regularly compares the Mac’s market share with that of German luxury cars). But what if you don’t want the BMW of PCs? What if you can only afford a Chevrolet?The present article is an attempt to prove to you that, on price alone, the Mac is not the BMW of computers. It is the Ford of computers. I am not arguing that the Mac is cheaper only if you consider the psychic benefits conferred by its quality. Rather I’m going to illustrate something more straightforward: Even though you may pay a slight premium at the cash register for a Mac over a comparable Windows PC (a premium that gets slighter all the time), it will cost you less money — real, honest-to-goodness American dollars — to own that Mac than to own that PC. Read the full article on The Machinist.

2 Responses to “Columnist: The ages-old Mac-vs.-PC debate is over. Long over. The Mac has won.”

  1. vistasucks Says:

    Similiar to this post…
    http://vistasucks.wordpress.com/2007/06/08/mac-vs-pc-cost-analysis-how-does-it-all-add-up/

  2. nail o donnel Says:

    Yes what here to think. MacOS the best. Thanks for an excellent post

Leave a Reply